tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post7772524342233608606..comments2024-01-08T01:42:56.289+05:30Comments on PHYSICS Information and Links: GATE 2013, Physics, Question and Answers Comment HereUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger44125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-51745314372592457702013-02-14T09:40:58.105+05:302013-02-14T09:40:58.105+05:302D 5/2, 2D 3/2 , 2P 3/2 , 2P 1/2 since the transi...2D 5/2, 2D 3/2 , 2P 3/2 , 2P 1/2 since the transition from 2D 5/2 to 2P 1/2 is forbidden so no line hence 2D 5/2 to 2P 3/2 , 2D 3/2 to 2P 3/2, 2D 3/2 to 2P 1/2 will give weak , weaker and weakest line respectively.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04892257609068075633noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-19761087128708860002013-02-14T09:36:12.229+05:302013-02-14T09:36:12.229+05:302D->2P transitions are diffuse series transitio...2D->2P transitions are diffuse series transition so it has only Triplet so 3 lines alone appearsAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04892257609068075633noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-85152192912726442442013-02-07T17:19:35.448+05:302013-02-07T17:19:35.448+05:307.6
7.6<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08333240322271229704noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-5287441361292994802013-02-07T17:18:55.012+05:302013-02-07T17:18:55.012+05:30its 7.6
its 7.6<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08333240322271229704noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-86497077464726420612013-02-02T16:15:11.316+05:302013-02-02T16:15:11.316+05:30pls post Q.paperpls post Q.paperAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08807895989940181340noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-24831756063001285372013-01-29T10:50:17.102+05:302013-01-29T10:50:17.102+05:30PROB DENSSITY 0.25PROB DENSSITY 0.25assenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08792388476361223471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-57518570158147259362013-01-29T10:49:31.020+05:302013-01-29T10:49:31.020+05:30rel force ans GAMM MoVrel force ans GAMM MoVassenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08792388476361223471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-50730819785842853112013-01-29T10:48:27.416+05:302013-01-29T10:48:27.416+05:30no it is 5 100% correctno it is 5 100% correctassenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08792388476361223471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-87381019404016213222013-01-24T12:55:07.625+05:302013-01-24T12:55:07.625+05:30yes it is 5
yes it is 5<br />Tribikramhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17613754895185680879noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-31677863877218200712013-01-24T09:36:53.955+05:302013-01-24T09:36:53.955+05:30what was that c optionwhat was that c optionv kulkarnihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02308584576317307495noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-14430808575012748962013-01-24T09:35:14.084+05:302013-01-24T09:35:14.084+05:30there may be no of transitions corresponds to sing...there may be no of transitions corresponds to single spectral line so they asked practically observed spectrl lines among all transitions <br />v kulkarnihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02308584576317307495noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-79285879134869269852013-01-24T09:28:15.343+05:302013-01-24T09:28:15.343+05:30hey any solved the spin matrix problem check it i ...hey any solved the spin matrix problem check it i gt 2.8 check it i think i m surev kulkarnihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02308584576317307495noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-9139393866174581882013-01-23T22:14:29.963+05:302013-01-23T22:14:29.963+05:30canonical momentum problem..L=alpha.q(dot)square-b...canonical momentum problem..L=alpha.q(dot)square-beta.q square <br />Answer is p=2.alpha.q(dot)<br />Pushpahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16430022310582820493noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-7776869716020916372013-01-23T16:31:18.866+05:302013-01-23T16:31:18.866+05:30(C) option(C) optionAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07069634416278902488noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-82236132339074571482013-01-23T12:53:32.287+05:302013-01-23T12:53:32.287+05:30what about the force and acceleration relation in ...what about the force and acceleration relation in relativity. My answer could not match any four of them. Later i checked my scratch paper answer on beiser book. it's matched. So guys whats your take on this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-8286619378813750082013-01-23T12:25:18.519+05:302013-01-23T12:25:18.519+05:30no its not 5 not 8 not 12...........okno its not 5 not 8 not 12...........okohmswasticahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12923204867410097141noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-75721100420691906652013-01-23T07:39:23.339+05:302013-01-23T07:39:23.339+05:3012 ???12 ???sreerajhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15530785032791556886noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-3266720145137695562013-01-23T07:37:48.846+05:302013-01-23T07:37:48.846+05:30This comment has been removed by the author.sreerajhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15530785032791556886noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-42160905552420846132013-01-23T07:37:47.140+05:302013-01-23T07:37:47.140+05:301212sreerajhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15530785032791556886noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-89456532049839550952013-01-23T02:59:47.043+05:302013-01-23T02:59:47.043+05:30relativistic force solution ?relativistic force solution ?v kulkarnihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02308584576317307495noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-17157592960253075302013-01-23T00:27:12.012+05:302013-01-23T00:27:12.012+05:30spin multiplicity is S=2s+1 so calculate for resul...spin multiplicity is S=2s+1 so calculate for resultant s for no of spectral linesv kulkarnihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02308584576317307495noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-41898949798269769172013-01-22T23:42:45.115+05:302013-01-22T23:42:45.115+05:305 spectral lines5 spectral linesAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11974145580903696241noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-31554291353829396802013-01-22T20:49:37.046+05:302013-01-22T20:49:37.046+05:30yes it is 5
yes it is 5<br />Pushpahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16430022310582820493noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-84131893404679948472013-01-22T16:05:48.978+05:302013-01-22T16:05:48.978+05:30ya it is 1/2,1/3ya it is 1/2,1/3sithahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04363539721681394812noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8705083632203739705.post-8538372531003269202013-01-22T11:15:40.086+05:302013-01-22T11:15:40.086+05:30the degenerate eigen value is 5 (I got).the degenerate eigen value is 5 (I got).Vijayaraghavanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02221559661262126985noreply@blogger.com